Keyword summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos978 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lottery Jackpot results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Anchoring Bias, Availability Heuristic, and Optimism Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 21.2% saturation with 764 hits. Analysis detected 4,831 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,601 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 69% (11,852 of 37,536 keywords). This Lottery Jackpot is worse (more manipulative) than 68.40% of the peer group.
Lottery Jackpot
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
69%Lottery Jackpot (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,601
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

68% percentile
025507510068.4% percentile
3.8% BS Score3 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 13.6%13.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.7%6.7%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 21.2%21.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Keyword 6.2%6.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 12.3%12.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 21.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 15.9%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 13.6%, sitewide 4.0%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 9.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 11.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 6.0%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 2.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 4.6%Bandwagon: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.8%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Red Herring: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Gambler’s Fallacy: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.0%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate