Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,869 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Los Angeles Lighting results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 11.9% saturation with 890 hits . Analysis detected 7,515 faulty-reasoning hits from 7,476 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 41% (22,228 of 37,533 keywords). This Los Angeles Lighting is better (less manipulative) than 59.20% of the peer group. Los Angeles Lighting
Keyword details
Total words: 7,476
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
41% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 40.8% percentile 2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles7.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 5.9% 5.9% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.1% 6.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 10.8% 10.8% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 11.9% 11.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 15.9% Anecdotal: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 5.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.4%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 3.3% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 6.0% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 2.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 4.6% Loss Aversion: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 2.5% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.0% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst