Keyword summary
23% 2 analyzed articles/videos 1,355 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Loop results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Optimism Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 11.1% saturation with 506 hits . Analysis detected 3,109 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,540 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 47% (19,944 of 37,536 keywords). This Loop is better (less manipulative) than 53.10% of the peer group. Loop
Keyword details
Total words: 4,540
Article count: 2
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
47% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 46.9% percentile 2.7% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 8.2% 8.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.6% 6.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.2% 2.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 11.2% 11.2% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.4% 4.4% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 15.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 11.2%, sitewide 5.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 6.0% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 2.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.8% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.1% Special Pleading: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.3% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.3% Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst