Keyword summary
â 0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Logan Act results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Ad Hominem , and Hasty Generalization , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 20% saturation with 546 hits . Analysis detected 3,303 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,736 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of â 0% (0 of 34,833 keywords). This Logan Act is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Logan Act
Keyword details
Total words: 2,736
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0â50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 6.7% 6.7% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 10.2% 10.2% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Burden of Proof Sitewide 0.4% Keyword 4.8% 4.8% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 20.0% 20.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 16.1% 16.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 26.9% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 20.0%, sitewide 15.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.1%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 11.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 2.2% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 5.3% Burden of Proof: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 0.4% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.6% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.8% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1% Tu Quoque: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst