Keyword summary
78% 1 analyzed article/video 703 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Living Situation results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Post Hoc (False Cause) , Indoctrination , and Confirmation Bias , with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 19.6% saturation with 827 hits . Analysis detected 5,389 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,218 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 71% (10,999 of 37,194 keywords). This Living Situation is worse (more manipulative) than 70.40% of the peer group. Living Situation
Keyword details
Total words: 4,218
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
70% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 70.4% percentile 4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.1% 2.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.9% 5.9% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 15.8% 15.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 19.6% 19.6% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 9.6% 9.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Appeal to Nature Sitewide 0.2% Keyword 5.5% 5.5% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 7.2% 7.2% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 19.6%, sitewide 8.1% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 15.9% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 15.8%, sitewide 3.3% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 11.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 9.6%, sitewide 0.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 7.5% Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Nature: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 0.2% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 5.3% Recency Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 2.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.8% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.5% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.1% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.9% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 1.1% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst