Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video3,295 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lives Fortunes And Sacred Honor results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Overconfidence Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 14.6% saturation with 1,922 hits. Analysis detected 5,751 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,180 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠4% (36,105 of 37,536 keywords). This Lives Fortunes And Sacred Honor is better (less manipulative) than 96.20% of the peer group.
Lives Fortunes And Sacred Honor
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 13,180
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

4% percentile
02550751003.8% percentile
1.3% BS Score1 analyzed articles13.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.4%0.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.3%2.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 14.6%14.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.1%1.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 14.6%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos