Keyword summary
11%2 analyzed articles/videos1,485 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Liuna 89 results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Self-Serving Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 5.8% saturation with 551 hits. Analysis detected 4,907 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,547 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 5% (34,162 of 35,675 keywords). This Liuna 89 is better (less manipulative) than 95.80% of the peer group.
Liuna 89
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
5%Liuna 89 (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 9,547
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

4% percentile
02550751004.2% percentile
1.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.8%5.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.7%1.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 3.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Burden of Proof: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.4%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos