Keyword summary
17% 1 analyzed article/video 1,119 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Little League results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 356 hits . Analysis detected 1,690 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,357 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 22% (29,272 of 37,536 keywords). This Little League is better (less manipulative) than 78.00% of the peer group. Little League
Keyword details
Total words: 3,357
Article count: 1
Authors
?
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
22% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 22.0% percentile 1.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.2% 4.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 10.6% 10.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 11.1% Halo Effect: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 6.7% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.3% False Dilemma: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 1.5% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.4% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.1% Primacy Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.9% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst
KTVU 61% 7/23/2026, 2:26:31 PM