Keyword summary
37% 4 analyzed articles/videos 3,272 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lithium Ion Batteries results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Biased Writer Voice , and Hasty Generalization , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 7.6% saturation with 894 hits . Analysis detected 9,004 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,698 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.9% and a BS Rank of 22% (27,122 of 34,495 keywords). This Lithium Ion Batteries is better (less manipulative) than 78.60% of the peer group. Lithium Ion Batteries
Keyword details
Total words: 11,698
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
21% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 21.4% percentile 1.9% BS Score4 analyzed articles11.7K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.1% 5.1% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.2% 1.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.2% 5.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias Sitewide 3.1% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 8.1% Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 6.0% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 6.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 5.3% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 0.0% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst