Keyword summary
0% 5 analyzed articles/videos 2,511 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lirr Strike results contain 43 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Self-Serving Bias , and Indoctrination , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 957 hits . Analysis detected 6,991 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,494 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 15% (32,046 of 37,536 keywords). This Lirr Strike is better (less manipulative) than 85.40% of the peer group. Lirr Strike
Keyword details
Total words: 9,494
Article count: 5
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
15% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 14.6% percentile 1.7% BS Score5 analyzed articles9.5K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.1% 10.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 3.1% 3.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 7.0% 7.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 3.0% 3.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.3% 2.3% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.2% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst