Keyword summary
27%4 analyzed articles/videos2,436 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lineage Logistics results contain 41 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Anecdotal, and Availability Heuristic, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 9% saturation with 1,366 hits. Analysis detected 10,346 faulty-reasoning hits from 15,121 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.7% and a BS Rank of 13% (30,963 of 35,590 keywords). This Lineage Logistics is better (less manipulative) than 87.00% of the peer group.
Lineage Logistics
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
13%Lineage Logistics (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 15,121
Article count: 4
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

13% percentile
025507510013.0% percentile
1.7% BS Score4 analyzed articles15.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.0%9.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.6%6.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.7%2.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 5.2%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.3%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate