Keyword summary
10% 1 analyzed article/video 2,411 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Line 5 Pipeline results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem , Optimism Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 6% saturation with 574 hits . Analysis detected 3,019 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,644 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0.8% and a BS Rank of 2% (50,496 of 51,244 keywords). This Line 5 Pipeline is better (less manipulative) than 98.50% of the peer group. Line 5 Pipeline
Keyword details
Total words: 9,644
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
2% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 1.5% percentile 0.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles9.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 0.7% 0.7% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 1.5% 1.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 6.0% 6.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.2% 0.2% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 6.0% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.2% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7% Begging the Question: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7% False Dilemma: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.5% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst