Keyword summary
28%1 analyzed article/video854 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lindsey Lapointe results contain 28 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 255 hits. Analysis detected 1,971 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,416 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.1% and a BS Rank of 27% (27,550 of 37,536 keywords). This Lindsey Lapointe is better (less manipulative) than 73.40% of the peer group.
Lindsey Lapointe
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
27%Lindsey Lapointe (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,416
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

27% percentile
025507510026.6% percentile
2.1% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.4%6.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.8%5.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.7%0.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.1%5.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.5%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos