Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These LGBTQ St Louis results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority , Self-Serving Bias , and False Dilemma , with Appeal to Emotion as the most egregious example at 7.8% saturation with 278 hits . Analysis detected 2,650 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,576 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 34,692 keywords). This LGBTQ St Louis is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. LGBTQ St Louis
Keyword details
Total words: 3,576
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 2.7% 2.7% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.4% 3.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 7.8% 7.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.7% 5.7% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 3.2% 3.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 3.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 5.2% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.5% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 0.8% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.9% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.6% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst