Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video426 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Leila Fadel results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Confirmation Bias, and Framing Effect, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 18.8% saturation with 240 hits. Analysis detected 1,824 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,278 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.5% and a BS Rank of 84% (6,208 of 37,536 keywords). This Leila Fadel is worse (more manipulative) than 83.50% of the peer group.
Leila Fadel
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
84%Leila Fadel (selected)6%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,278
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

84% percentile
025507510083.5% percentile
5.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 11.6%11.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 18.8%18.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 9.3%9.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 13.5%13.5%BandwagonSitewide 2.2%Keyword 5.9%5.9%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Primacy EffectSitewide 0.9%Keyword 3.5%3.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 7.8%7.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Keyword 18.8%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 14.5%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 13.5%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 8.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 5.2%In-Group Bias: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 6.0%Bandwagon: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Primacy Effect: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Appeal to Nature: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos