Keyword summary
86%1 analyzed article/video537 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Legal Scrutiny results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Negativity Bias, and Confirmation Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 20.4% saturation with 329 hits. Analysis detected 1,990 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,611 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4% and a BS Rank of 71% (10,625 of 35,740 keywords). This Legal Scrutiny is worse (more manipulative) than 70.30% of the peer group.
Legal Scrutiny
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
71%Legal Scrutiny (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,611
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

70% percentile
025507510070.3% percentile
4.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 19.6%19.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 11.6%11.6%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 20.4%20.4%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Politically Left Leaning …Sitewide 2.0%Keyword 6.2%6.2%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Keyword 5.8%5.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 3.9%3.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 20.4%, sitewide 26.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 19.6%, sitewide 5.3%Negativity Bias: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 8.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 6.9%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 2.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 2.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 3.3%Begging the Question: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 1.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 0.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.8%Horn Effect: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 1.0%Composition/Division: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.9%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos