Keyword summary
54%1 analyzed article/video1,429 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lectura results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Halo Effect, and Appeal to Authority, with Post Hoc (False Cause) as the most egregious example at 10.2% saturation with 437 hits. Analysis detected 2,597 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,287 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 23% (26,940 of 34,833 keywords). This Lectura is better (less manipulative) than 77.30% of the peer group.
Lectura
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
23%Lectura (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,287
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

23% percentile
025507510022.7% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 10.2%10.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.3%2.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 11.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 10.2%, sitewide 3.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 1.9%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.4%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.5%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos