Keyword summary
⁠0%4 analyzed articles/videos3,219 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Leavenworth results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Appeal to Emotion, and Appeal to Authority, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 15.1% saturation with 1,389 hits. Analysis detected 10,687 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,185 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of ⁠42% (21,474 of 36,465 keywords). This Leavenworth is better (less manipulative) than 58.90% of the peer group.
Leavenworth
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠0%Javian Hawkins1%
⁠0%Atlanta Falcons1%
⁠42%Leavenworth (selected)3%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

41% percentile
025507510041.1% percentile
2.5% BS Score4 analyzed articles9.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 14.6%14.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 9.8%9.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 6.2%6.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 15.1%15.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 14.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 0.8%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 6.0%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 4.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.0%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos