Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Lead Pipes results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Availability Heuristic, and Self-Serving Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 8.5% saturation with 312 hits. Analysis detected 2,888 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,686 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Lead Pipes is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Lead Pipes
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%Lead Pipes (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,686
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.6%2.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 8.5%8.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.9%4.9%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 2.0%2.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 3.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.5%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos