Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video708 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Laura Siegemund results contain 25 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Unattributed Quote, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.4% saturation with 210 hits. Analysis detected 2,104 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,832 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3% and a BS Rank of 53% (17,902 of 37,536 keywords). This Laura Siegemund is worse (more manipulative) than 52.30% of the peer group.
Laura Siegemund
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
53%Laura Siegemund (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,832
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

52% percentile
025507510052.3% percentile
3.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.4%7.4%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.2%3.2%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 5.4%5.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.4%2.4%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 0.6%0.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 15.9%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 6.7%In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 6.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 1.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 5.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.1%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7%Composition/Division: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 0.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos