Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,293 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Latvia results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Authority, and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.8% saturation with 994 hits. Analysis detected 7,961 faulty-reasoning hits from 9,172 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.3% and a BS Rank of 37% (23,963 of 37,536 keywords). This Latvia is better (less manipulative) than 63.80% of the peer group.
Latvia
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
37%Latvia (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 9,172
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

36% percentile
025507510036.2% percentile
2.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles9.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 10.8%10.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.2%5.2%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.1%5.1%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 4.0%4.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 4.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 1.9%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.8%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos