Keyword summary
52%2 analyzed articles/videos998 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Latino Voters results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Anecdotal, In-Group Bias, and Halo Effect, with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 24.2% saturation with 1,449 hits. Analysis detected 7,150 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,987 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.4% and a BS Rank of 62% (14,472 of 37,536 keywords). This Latino Voters is worse (more manipulative) than 61.40% of the peer group.
Latino Voters
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
62%Latino Voters (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,987
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

61% percentile
025507510061.4% percentile
3.4% BS Score2 analyzed articles6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 24.2%24.2%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.8%3.8%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.9%6.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 4.0%4.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 7.7%7.7%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 2.4%2.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 26.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 24.2%, sitewide 8.1%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 6.0%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.2%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 3.1%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.5%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.8%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos