Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,956 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Language Revitalisation results contain 31 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Framing Effect, and Appeal to Emotion, with Appeal to Authority as the most egregious example at 20.6% saturation with 967 hits. Analysis detected 5,188 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,685 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.6% and a BS Rank of 65% (12,716 of 35,718 keywords). This Language Revitalisation is worse (more manipulative) than 64.40% of the peer group.
Language Revitalisation
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
65%Language Revitalisation (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,685
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

64% percentile
025507510064.4% percentile
3.6% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 10.8%10.8%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 20.6%20.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 14.6%14.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 7.5%7.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.4%5.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 1.5%1.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 4.1%4.1%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 1.2%1.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 20.6%, sitewide 11.1%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 14.6%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 6.9%Anecdotal: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 5.2%Halo Effect: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 3.3%Loss Aversion: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos