Keyword summary
40%1 analyzed article/video1,719 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Land Protection results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Appeal to Emotion, and Framing Effect, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 10.1% saturation with 519 hits. Analysis detected 3,728 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,157 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 31% (24,622 of 35,635 keywords). This Land Protection is better (less manipulative) than 69.10% of the peer group.
Land Protection
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
31%Land Protection (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,157
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

31% percentile
025507510030.9% percentile
2.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.2K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 5.6%5.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 10.1%10.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 8.6%8.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.7%1.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.7%3.7%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.8%1.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.6%1.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.6%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 1.9%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.7%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%False Dilemma: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos