Keyword summary
80%2 analyzed articles/videos1,017 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lancaster County results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization, Negativity Bias, and Availability Heuristic, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.7% saturation with 419 hits. Analysis detected 3,312 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,051 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 3.1% and a BS Rank of 56% (16,720 of 37,536 keywords). This Lancaster County is worse (more manipulative) than 55.50% of the peer group.
Lancaster County
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
56%Lancaster County (selected)4%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 3,051
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

56% percentile
025507510055.5% percentile
3.1% BS Score2 analyzed articles3.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 13.7%13.7%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.9%7.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.9%6.9%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product…Sitewide 0.5%Keyword 5.5%5.5%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Slippery SlopeSitewide 1.7%Keyword 5.9%5.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 13.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 8.3%, sitewide 8.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 7.8%, sitewide 5.2%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 5.3%Optimism Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 6.0%Slippery Slope: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 1.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 0.5%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 3.1%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 4.0%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 0.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate