Keyword summary
12%2 analyzed articles/videos2,001 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lake Memphremagog results contain 30 faulty reasoning types, including Optimism Bias, Burden of Proof, and Hasty Generalization, with Overconfidence Bias as the most egregious example at 3.6% saturation with 216 hits. Analysis detected 2,416 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,003 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 5% (35,767 of 37,536 keywords). This Lake Memphremagog is better (less manipulative) than 95.30% of the peer group.
Lake Memphremagog
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
5%Lake Memphremagog (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 6,003
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

5% percentile
02550751004.7% percentile
1.3% BS Score2 analyzed articles6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.8%1.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.2%1.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 3.3%3.3%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 7.5%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.3%Burden of Proof: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.4%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 1.7%Begging the Question: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 1.5%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.4%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.1%Red Herring: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos