Keyword summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos3,035 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lafd results contain 40 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Self-Serving Bias, and Hindsight Bias, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21.9% saturation with 2,531 hits. Analysis detected 13,620 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,561 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.9% and a BS Rank of 52% (18,159 of 37,536 keywords). This Lafd is worse (more manipulative) than 51.60% of the peer group.
Lafd
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
52%Lafd (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 11,561
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

52% percentile
025507510051.6% percentile
2.9% BS Score3 analyzed articles11.6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 15.7%15.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 11.0%11.0%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Keyword 7.6%7.6%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.3%5.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Special PleadingSitewide 0.3%Keyword 4.9%4.9%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 15.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 21.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 11.1%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 3.7%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 8.1%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 1.4%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.2%Special Pleading: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 0.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.2%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.5%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate