Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,119 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Lacklustre Reviews results contain 37 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Ad Hominem, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 21.1% saturation with 945 hits. Analysis detected 4,106 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,476 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.5% and a BS Rank of 40% (22,577 of 37,536 keywords). This Lacklustre Reviews is better (less manipulative) than 60.10% of the peer group.
Lacklustre Reviews
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
40%Lacklustre Reviews (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,476
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

40% percentile
025507510039.9% percentile
2.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.5%8.5%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 2.5%2.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 1.6%1.6%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.3%1.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.1%0.1%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 4.5%4.5%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.8%0.8%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 21.1%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 2.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.6%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.1%Primacy Effect: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 0.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate