Keyword summary
⁠38%1 analyzed article/video1,601 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Laborers International Union Of North America results contain 33 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Ad Hominem, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 7.5% saturation with 358 hits. Analysis detected 2,829 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,803 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 1.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠17% (31,202 of 37,536 keywords). This Laborers International Union Of North America is better (less manipulative) than 83.10% of the peer group.
Laborers International Union Of North America
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 4,803
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

17% percentile
025507510016.9% percentile
1.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 7.5%7.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.3%5.3%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.7%0.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 2.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.4%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos