Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Labor Negotiations results contain 46 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Confirmation Bias, and Framing Effect, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 10.6% saturation with 1,094 hits. Analysis detected 10,449 faulty-reasoning hits from 10,347 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Labor Negotiations is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Labor Negotiations
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%Labor Negotiations (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 10,347
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles10.3K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 6.8%6.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 9.4%9.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.2%6.2%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.3%2.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 5.1%5.1%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 10.6%10.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.8%0.8%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 1.4%1.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 9.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.2%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.1%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 9.0%, sitewide 7.5%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 5.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 2.0%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%False Dilemma: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 1.5%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 0.0%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.5%Begging the Question: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.7%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos