Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,682 analyzed words
BS Summary: These La Vina results contain 32 faulty reasoning types, including Biased Writer Voice, Appeal to Emotion, and Negativity Bias, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 10.7% saturation with 723 hits. Analysis detected 4,250 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,728 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 24% (28,282 of 36,912 keywords). This La Vina is better (less manipulative) than 76.60% of the peer group.
La Vina
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
24%La Vina (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 6,728
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

23% percentile
025507510023.4% percentile
2.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 10.8%10.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 6.6%6.6%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.2%0.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 9.8%9.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 0.3%0.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 10.1%10.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 11.1%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 5.3%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 5.2%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.9%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.4%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos