Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video1,373 analyzed words
BS Summary: These La Indiana Tamales results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Appeal to Emotion, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Hasty Generalization as the most egregious example at 17.6% saturation with 724 hits. Analysis detected 8,227 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,119 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠86% (5,349 of 37,536 keywords). This La Indiana Tamales is worse (more manipulative) than 85.80% of the peer group.
La Indiana Tamales
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠86%La Indiana Tamales (selected)6%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,119
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

86% percentile
025507510085.8% percentile
5.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 11.4%11.4%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 17.6%17.6%Post Hoc (False Cause)Sitewide 3.3%Keyword 12.7%12.7%Loss AversionSitewide 2.5%Keyword 10.8%10.8%Self-Serving BiasSitewide 3.7%Keyword 9.9%9.9%False DilemmaSitewide 1.5%Keyword 7.0%7.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 10.1%10.1%Straw ManSitewide 0.9%Keyword 5.6%5.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 12.1%12.1%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Keyword 6.6%6.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 15.7%, sitewide 19.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 17.6%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 14.1%, sitewide 15.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 12.7%, sitewide 3.3%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 7.5%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 11.1%Loss Aversion: Keyword 10.8%, sitewide 2.5%Anecdotal: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 5.2%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 9.9%, sitewide 3.7%Halo Effect: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 9.1%False Dilemma: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 1.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 6.9%Recency Bias: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 2.7%Straw Man: Keyword 5.6%, sitewide 0.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 2.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 4.3%, sitewide 4.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 1.9%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 3.1%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos