Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video1,342 analyzed words
BS Summary: These L A Dining results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 35.1% saturation with 1,886 hits. Analysis detected 8,513 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,368 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 4.7% and a BS Rank of 78% (8,533 of 37,536 keywords). This L A Dining is worse (more manipulative) than 77.30% of the peer group.
L A Dining
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
78%L A Dining (selected)5%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,368
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

77% percentile
025507510077.3% percentile
4.7% BS Score1 analyzed articles5.4K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 35.1%35.1%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 1.4%1.4%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 27.4%27.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 14.5%14.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 4.7%4.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.1%1.1%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 11.0%11.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 35.1%, sitewide 5.3%Halo Effect: Keyword 27.4%, sitewide 6.7%Framing Effect: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 13.1%, sitewide 15.9%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 14.5%, sitewide 8.1%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 11.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 11.0%, sitewide 5.2%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.9%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 4.6%Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 6.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 1.9%Indoctrination: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 0.0%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 2.2%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.4%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Begging the Question: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 1.7%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos