Keyword summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos1,991 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kyle Whittingham results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Negativity Bias, and Appeal to Emotion, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 25.4% saturation with 1,517 hits. Analysis detected 11,669 faulty-reasoning hits from 5,962 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 5.4% and a BS Rank of 83% (6,209 of 36,404 keywords). This Kyle Whittingham is worse (more manipulative) than 82.90% of the peer group.
Kyle Whittingham
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
83%Kyle Whittingham (selected)6%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 5,962
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

83% percentile
025507510082.9% percentile
5.4% BS Score3 analyzed articles6K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–25%
0.0%5%10%15%20%25%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 22.6%22.6%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 13.1%13.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.8%4.8%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Keyword 5.9%5.9%Hindsight BiasSitewide 1.4%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 7.7%7.7%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 13.5%13.5%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 6.3%6.3%Pessimism BiasSitewide 1.9%Keyword 4.2%4.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 25.4%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 22.6%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity Bias: Keyword 19.6%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 13.5%, sitewide 15.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 13.1%, sitewide 6.0%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 11.8%, sitewide 11.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 9.8%, sitewide 8.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 9.1%In-Group Bias: Keyword 8.2%, sitewide 6.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.9%, sitewide 7.5%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 6.3%, sitewide 4.0%Begging the Question: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 1.7%Anecdotal: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.2%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 1.4%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 1.9%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 3.2%, sitewide 2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.1%Recency Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.7%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.9%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate