Keyword summary
0%3 analyzed articles/videos2,656 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Ku Athletics results contain 45 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Optimism Bias, and Hasty Generalization, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 15.7% saturation with 1,410 hits. Analysis detected 11,070 faulty-reasoning hits from 8,977 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.7% and a BS Rank of 47% (19,080 of 35,936 keywords). This Ku Athletics is better (less manipulative) than 53.10% of the peer group.
Ku Athletics
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
0%Anthony Romano1%
47%Ku Athletics (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 8,977
Article count: 3
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

47% percentile
025507510046.9% percentile
2.7% BS Score3 analyzed articles9K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 15.7%15.7%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 6.4%6.4%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 13.5%13.5%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 4.5%4.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 6.5%6.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 2.7%2.7%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 2.2%2.2%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 5.4%5.4%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 2.2%2.2%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 15.7%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.5%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 8.1%Optimism Bias: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 6.0%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 6.1%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 6.7%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 4.0%Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.0%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate