Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 733 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kristian Winfield results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Recency Bias , and Hasty Generalization , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 32.3% saturation with 711 hits . Analysis detected 3,873 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,199 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 5.2% and a BS Rank of 82% (6,953 of 37,536 keywords). This Kristian Winfield is worse (more manipulative) than 81.50% of the peer group. Kristian Winfield
Keyword details
Total words: 2,199
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
82% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 81.5% percentile 5.2% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 32.3% 32.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 10.5% 10.5% Recency Bias Sitewide 2.7% Keyword 17.1% 17.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 2.9% 2.9% Hindsight Bias Sitewide 1.4% Keyword 8.7% 8.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 5.9% 5.9% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 12.1% 12.1% Sunk Cost Effect Sitewide 0.3% Keyword 4.0% 4.0% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 22.8% 22.8% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 32.3%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Keyword 10.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 22.8%, sitewide 19.2% Recency Bias: Keyword 17.1%, sitewide 2.7% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 15.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 8.1% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 1.4% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 7.5% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 6.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 5.2% Slippery Slope: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 1.7% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 3.3% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 1.9% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 4.0% Sunk Cost Effect: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 0.3% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.5% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.7% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.8% Loss Aversion: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 2.5% Ad Hominem: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.0% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst