Keyword summary
0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Knicks Parade Pay results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Biased Writer Voice, and Anchoring Bias, with In-Group Bias as the most egregious example at 14.6% saturation with 259 hits. Analysis detected 1,879 faulty-reasoning hits from 1,772 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Knicks Parade Pay is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Knicks Parade Pay
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%Knicks Parade Pay (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 1,772
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles1.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 8.5%8.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 4.0%4.0%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 14.6%14.6%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 9.5%9.5%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 10.7%10.7%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 5.0%5.0%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 12.0%12.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 4.7%4.7%Quote-first MisdirectionSitewide 0.0%Keyword 2.6%2.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 8.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 4.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 12.0%, sitewide 15.9%In-Group Bias: Keyword 14.6%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 10.7%, sitewide 5.3%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 4.0%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 8.1%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.0%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 1.1%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 3.7%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 2.2%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 2.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 0.0%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 0.5%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.2%Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.9%Red Herring: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.7%Indoctrination: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.8%Composition/Division: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.2%Burden of Proof: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 0.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos