Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video883 analyzed words
BS Summary: These King Charles Iii Trump State Visit results contain 34 faulty reasoning types, including Ad Hominem, Negativity Bias, and Framing Effect, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 17.6% saturation with 620 hits. Analysis detected 4,649 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,532 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.9% and a BS Rank of ⁠69% (11,677 of 37,536 keywords). This King Charles Iii Trump State Visit is worse (more manipulative) than 68.90% of the peer group.
King Charles Iii Trump State Visit
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details
Total words: 3,532
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

69% percentile
025507510068.9% percentile
3.9% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 9.5%9.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 17.6%17.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 5.8%5.8%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 10.1%10.1%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 10.6%10.6%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.0%1.0%AnecdotalSitewide 5.2%Keyword 0.6%0.6%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.5%3.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 3.3%3.3%Ambiguity (Equivocation)Sitewide 0.8%Keyword 4.6%4.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 9.5%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 19.2%Halo Effect: Keyword 17.6%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 11.1%Ad Hominem: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 2.2%Optimism Bias: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 6.0%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 4.6%Anecdotal: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 5.2%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 0.8%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 3.7%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.1%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 3.3%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 2.7%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 1.9%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos