Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 724 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kimberlee Singler results contain 24 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Confirmation Bias , and Self-Serving Bias , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 30.6% saturation with 665 hits . Analysis detected 3,405 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,172 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 6.5% and a BS Rank of 89% (4,382 of 37,536 keywords). This Kimberlee Singler is worse (more manipulative) than 88.30% of the peer group. Kimberlee Singler
Keyword details
Total words: 2,172
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
88% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 88.3% percentile 6.5% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.2K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Self-Serving Bias Sitewide 3.7% Keyword 12.3% 12.3% Post Hoc (False Cause) Sitewide 3.3% Keyword 8.9% 8.9% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 9.2% 9.2% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 12.3% 12.3% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 6.9% 6.9% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 30.6% 30.6% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 16.0% 16.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 30.6%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 16.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 15.9% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 7.5% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 3.7% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 12.1%, sitewide 11.1% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 9.2%, sitewide 4.0% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 9.1% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 8.9%, sitewide 3.3% Ad Hominem: Keyword 6.9%, sitewide 2.2% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 6.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 2.7% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 3.1% Loss Aversion: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 2.5% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.6% Special Pleading: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 0.3% Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.4% Red Herring: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.7% Primacy Effect: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 0.9% Begging the Question: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.7% Hindsight Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.4% Blind-Spot Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 0.2% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst