Keyword summary
95% 1 analyzed article/video 1,294 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kimbal Musk results contain 42 faulty reasoning types, including Hasty Generalization , Negativity Bias , and Ad Hominem , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 40.1% saturation with 1,556 hits . Analysis detected 6,190 faulty-reasoning hits from 3,882 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 3.8% and a BS Rank of 68% (12,145 of 37,536 keywords). This Kimbal Musk is worse (more manipulative) than 67.60% of the peer group. Kimbal Musk
Keyword details
Total words: 3,882
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
68% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 67.6% percentile 3.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles3.9K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 40.1% 40.1% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.6% 4.6% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 21.7% 21.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.5% 0.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 6.8% 6.8% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Ad Hominem Sitewide 2.2% Keyword 7.7% 7.7% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.9% 1.9% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Anchoring Bias Sitewide 4.0% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 40.1%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 26.9% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 21.7%, sitewide 8.1% Negativity Bias: Keyword 21.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 6.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 6.7%, sitewide 9.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 7.7%, sitewide 2.2% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 5.7%, sitewide 5.2% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 3.1% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% False Dilemma: Keyword 3.8%, sitewide 1.5% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 1.9% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.9% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 0.5% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst