Keyword summary
0% 1 analyzed article/video 1,694 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kim Phillips Fein results contain 36 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias , Hasty Generalization , and Framing Effect , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 20.5% saturation with 1,392 hits . Analysis detected 6,904 faulty-reasoning hits from 6,776 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 2.8% and a BS Rank of 49% (19,188 of 37,536 keywords). This Kim Phillips Fein is better (less manipulative) than 51.10% of the peer group. Kim Phillips Fein
Keyword details
Total words: 6,776
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
49% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 48.9% percentile 2.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles6.8K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Keyword SitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 20.5% 20.5% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.8% 2.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.6% 1.6% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 1.1% 1.1% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.0% 2.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.3% 1.3% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 26.9% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 20.5%, sitewide 5.3% Negativity Bias: Keyword 18.4%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 2.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 3.1% Ad Hominem: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 2.2% Slippery Slope: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 1.7% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 2.7% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.9% Unattributed Quote: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 1.1% Indoctrination: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.0% Horn Effect: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst