Keyword summary
ā 0% 1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Ken Russell results contain 26 faulty reasoning types, including Framing Effect , Negativity Bias , and Appeal to Emotion , with Biased Writer Voice as the most egregious example at 47.9% saturation with 2,194 hits . Analysis detected 7,345 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,576 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ā 0% (0 of 37,326 keywords). This Ken Russell is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group. Ken Russell
Keyword details
Total words: 4,576
Article count: 1
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
0% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 0.0% percentile 0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles4.6K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0ā75%
0.0% 20% 40% 60% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide 5.3% Keyword 48.0% 48.0% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 0.9% 0.9% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Ambiguity (Equivocation) Sitewide 0.8% Keyword 7.1% 7.1% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 13.0% 13.0% Indoctrination Sitewide 0.0% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Anecdotal Sitewide 5.2% Keyword 1.0% 1.0% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 12.0% 12.0% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 20% 20% 40% 40% 60% 60% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 48.0%, sitewide 5.3% Framing Effect: Keyword 24.9%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 13.0%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 12.0%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 11.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 10.1%, sitewide 7.5% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 8.1% Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 7.1%, sitewide 0.8% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 6.0% Indoctrination: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 0.0% Begging the Question: Keyword 5.5%, sitewide 1.7% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 3.3% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.7% Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 1.9% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 2.2% Pessimism Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.9% Slippery Slope: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 1.7% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 0.5% Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 0.6% Personal Incredulity: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 0.2% Biased Writer Voice Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst