Keyword summary
⁠0%5 analyzed articles/videos5,342 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kem C Gardner Policy Institute results contain 49 faulty reasoning types, including Negativity Bias, Hasty Generalization, and Appeal to Emotion, with Anecdotal as the most egregious example at 8.7% saturation with 1,693 hits. Analysis detected 12,668 faulty-reasoning hits from 19,496 analyzed words across 5 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of ⁠5% (35,852 of 37,536 keywords). This Kem C Gardner Policy Institute is better (less manipulative) than 95.50% of the peer group.
Kem C Gardner Policy Institute
Keyword ranking list
Keyword details

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

5% percentile
02550751004.5% percentile
1.3% BS Score5 analyzed articles19.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.4%5.4%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 4.4%4.4%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.7%2.7%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 0.5%0.5%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Biased Writer VoiceSitewide 5.3%Keyword 0.8%0.8%Anchoring BiasSitewide 4.0%Keyword 0.5%0.5%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 9.1%Anecdotal: Keyword 8.7%, sitewide 5.2%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 6.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 4.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 3.3%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 3.7%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos