Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos
BS Summary: These Keisha Lance Bottoms results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Authority, Politically Right Leaning Bias, and Halo Effect, with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 23% saturation with 625 hits. Analysis detected 3,158 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,721 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of 0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Keisha Lance Bottoms is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Keisha Lance Bottoms
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
0%Keisha Lance Bottoms (selected)0%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,721
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 3.0%3.0%Politically Right Leaning…Sitewide 1.4%Keyword 11.9%11.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 9.3%9.3%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.9%0.9%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 11.5%11.5%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 3.4%3.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 23.0%23.0%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 4.4%4.4%IndoctrinationSitewide 0.0%Keyword 3.1%3.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 23.0%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 9.3%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 11.1%Politically Right Leaning Bias: Keyword 11.9%, sitewide 1.4%Halo Effect: Keyword 11.5%, sitewide 6.7%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 4.4%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 6.9%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 6.6%, sitewide 3.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 2.7%, sitewide 5.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 4.6%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 3.3%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.5%Indoctrination: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 0.0%Bandwagon: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 2.2%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 1.9%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Quote-first Misdirection: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.0%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 0.8%False Dilemma: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.5%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos