Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video
BS Summary: These Keir Starmer Resignation Pressure Burnham Uk Politics results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Halo Effect, Framing Effect, and Biased Writer Voice, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 14.2% saturation with 356 hits. Analysis detected 2,585 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,500 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 0% and a BS Rank of ⁠0% (0 of 37,536 keywords). This Keir Starmer Resignation Pressure Burnham Uk Politics is better (less manipulative) than 100.00% of the peer group.
Keir Starmer Resignation Pressure Burnham Uk Politics
Keyword details
Total words: 2,500
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

0% percentile
02550751000.0% percentile
0.0% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.5K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 7.2%7.2%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 3.1%3.1%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.4%1.4%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 1.5%1.5%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 14.2%14.2%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 11.6%11.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 1.9%1.9%Recency BiasSitewide 2.7%Keyword 6.4%6.4%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 7.2%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 14.2%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 11.6%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 6.9%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 6.5%, sitewide 5.3%Recency Bias: Keyword 6.4%, sitewide 2.7%Optimism Bias: Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 6.0%Bandwagon: Keyword 4.9%, sitewide 2.2%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 3.3%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 4.6%Ad Hominem: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 2.2%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 2.7%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 4.0%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 3.7%, sitewide 1.9%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 1.5%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 1.9%Ambiguity (Equivocation): Keyword 1.9%, sitewide 0.8%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 0.5%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 1.4%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos