Keyword summary
0% 3 analyzed articles/videos 2,008 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kauffman Stadium results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion , Framing Effect , and Negativity Bias , with Optimism Bias as the most egregious example at 11.4% saturation with 1,528 hits . Analysis detected 7,011 faulty-reasoning hits from 13,427 analyzed words across 3 articles, generating a BS Score of 1.3% and a BS Rank of 5% (35,777 of 37,536 keywords). This Kauffman Stadium is better (less manipulative) than 95.30% of the peer group. Kauffman Stadium
Keyword details
Total words: 13,427
Article count: 3
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
5% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 4.7% percentile 1.3% BS Score3 analyzed articles13.4K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 4.5% 4.5% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 3.3% 3.3% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 4.7% 4.7% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 2.5% 2.5% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 0.8% 0.8% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 1.8% 1.8% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 0.3% 0.3% Halo Effect Sitewide 6.7% Keyword 0.6% 0.6% Optimism Bias Sitewide 6.0% Keyword 11.4% 11.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 1.7% 1.7% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 4.5%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 15.9% Optimism Bias: Keyword 11.4%, sitewide 6.0% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 11.1% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.8%, sitewide 9.1% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 0.6%, sitewide 6.7% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 5.3% Anecdotal: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 3.7% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 3.1% Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 2.7% Recency Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 2.7% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 2.2% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.2% Ad Hominem: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst