Keyword summary
0%2 analyzed articles/videos2,945 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kate results contain 35 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Biased Writer Voice, and Anecdotal, with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 24.5% saturation with 2,888 hits. Analysis detected 8,209 faulty-reasoning hits from 11,780 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 25% (28,346 of 37,374 keywords). This Kate is better (less manipulative) than 75.80% of the peer group.
Kate
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
0%Javian Hawkins1%
0%Atlanta Falcons1%
25%Kate (selected)2%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 11,780
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

24% percentile
025507510024.2% percentile
2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles11.8K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 1.0%1.0%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 24.5%24.5%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.9%2.9%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 8.1%8.1%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 0.8%0.8%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.7%0.7%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.3%2.3%Overconfidence BiasSitewide 4.6%Keyword 0.1%0.1%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 26.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 24.5%, sitewide 6.7%Negativity Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 8.1%, sitewide 15.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.9%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.7%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 6.0%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 5.2%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.1%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 3.3%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 0.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.2%Indoctrination: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 0.0%Representativeness Heuristic: Keyword 0.5%, sitewide 1.9%Pessimism Bias: Keyword 0.2%, sitewide 1.9%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate