Keyword summary
0% 4 analyzed articles/videos 3,955 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kansas City World Cup results contain 39 faulty reasoning types, including Attempt to Sell a Product or Service , Biased Writer Voice , and Appeal to Emotion , with Framing Effect as the most egregious example at 13.1% saturation with 1,854 hits . Analysis detected 12,267 faulty-reasoning hits from 14,117 analyzed words across 4 articles, generating a BS Score of 2.2% and a BS Rank of 33% (25,385 of 37,536 keywords). This Kansas City World Cup is better (less manipulative) than 67.60% of the peer group. Kansas City World Cup
Keyword details
Total words: 14,117
Article count: 4
Authors
Ranking context Position among analyzed keywords
32% percentile 0 25 50 75 100 32.4% percentile 2.2% BS Score4 analyzed articles14.1K analyzed words
Reasoning profile Selected profile versus the sitewide rate
Highest rates Largest gaps
Shared scale 0–50%
0.0% 10% 20% 30% 40% 50% Negativity Bias Sitewide 19.2% Keyword 5.3% 5.3% Framing Effect Sitewide 26.9% Keyword 13.1% 13.1% Appeal to Emotion Sitewide 15.9% Keyword 5.8% 5.8% Appeal to Authority Sitewide 11.1% Keyword 1.4% 1.4% Attempt to Sell a Product… Sitewide 0.5% Keyword 10.0% 10.0% Availability Heuristic Sitewide 9.1% Keyword 3.9% 3.9% Confirmation Bias Sitewide 7.5% Keyword 2.4% 2.4% In-Group Bias Sitewide 6.9% Keyword 2.6% 2.6% Overconfidence Bias Sitewide 4.6% Keyword 0.4% 0.4% Hasty Generalization Sitewide 8.1% Keyword 4.1% 4.1% Sitewide departure map Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often
0.0% 0.0% 10% 10% 20% 20% 30% 30% 40% 40% 50% 50% Framing Effect: Keyword 13.1%, sitewide 26.9% Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.3%, sitewide 19.2% Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 5.8%, sitewide 15.9% Appeal to Authority: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 11.1% Attempt to Sell a Product or Service: Keyword 10.0%, sitewide 0.5% Availability Heuristic: Keyword 3.9%, sitewide 9.1% Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 8.8%, sitewide 5.3% Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 8.1% Confirmation Bias: Keyword 2.4%, sitewide 7.5% In-Group Bias: Keyword 2.6%, sitewide 6.9% Halo Effect: Keyword 4.6%, sitewide 6.7% Optimism Bias: Keyword 4.7%, sitewide 6.0% Anecdotal: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 5.2% Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.6% Anchoring Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 4.0% Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.7% Indoctrination: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 0.0% Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 1.2%, sitewide 3.3% Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1% Recency Bias: Keyword 1.1%, sitewide 2.7% Bandwagon: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 2.2% Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.5% Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2% Politically Left Leaning Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 2.0% Framing Effect Sitewide rate Keyword rate Analyzed articles and videos Sort by Most recent Article rank - best Article rank - worst