Keyword summary
32%2 analyzed articles/videos435 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Kane Parsons results contain 38 faulty reasoning types, including Confirmation Bias, Negativity Bias, and Post Hoc (False Cause), with Halo Effect as the most egregious example at 12.3% saturation with 508 hits. Analysis detected 3,183 faulty-reasoning hits from 4,117 analyzed words across 2 articles, generating a BS Score of 2% and a BS Rank of 26% (27,878 of 37,536 keywords). This Kane Parsons is better (less manipulative) than 74.30% of the peer group.
Kane Parsons
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
0%Lieutenant Governor1%
0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
0%Texas Supreme Court1%
0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
0%Running Back1%
26%Kane Parsons (selected)3%
100%Rad Power Bikes60%
100%Mike Lewis60%
100%Joni Balter60%
100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 4,117
Article count: 2
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

26% percentile
025507510025.7% percentile
2.0% BS Score2 analyzed articles4.1K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 3.6%3.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 1.6%1.6%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 5.9%5.9%Appeal to AuthoritySitewide 11.1%Keyword 2.0%2.0%Availability HeuristicSitewide 9.1%Keyword 2.5%2.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 0.3%0.3%Halo EffectSitewide 6.7%Keyword 12.3%12.3%Hasty GeneralizationSitewide 8.1%Keyword 2.8%2.8%Optimism BiasSitewide 6.0%Keyword 2.1%2.1%Unattributed QuoteSitewide 1.1%Keyword 5.0%5.0%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Framing Effect: Keyword 3.6%, sitewide 26.9%Negativity Bias: Keyword 5.9%, sitewide 19.2%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 1.6%, sitewide 15.9%Halo Effect: Keyword 12.3%, sitewide 6.7%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 11.1%Availability Heuristic: Keyword 2.5%, sitewide 9.1%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 2.8%, sitewide 8.1%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 7.0%, sitewide 7.5%In-Group Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 6.9%Optimism Bias: Keyword 2.1%, sitewide 6.0%Post Hoc (False Cause): Keyword 5.4%, sitewide 3.3%Biased Writer Voice: Keyword 4.1%, sitewide 5.3%Anecdotal: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 5.2%Unattributed Quote: Keyword 5.0%, sitewide 1.1%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 0.8%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.5%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.7%, sitewide 3.7%Hindsight Bias: Keyword 3.5%, sitewide 1.4%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 0.3%, sitewide 3.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 0.0%, sitewide 2.7%Recency Bias: Keyword 1.4%, sitewide 2.7%Loss Aversion: Keyword 0.9%, sitewide 2.5%Bandwagon: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 0.4%, sitewide 2.2%Framing EffectSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos