Keyword summary
⁠0%1 analyzed article/video911 analyzed words
BS Summary: These Justice Department Redactions results contain 27 faulty reasoning types, including Appeal to Emotion, Confirmation Bias, and Ad Hominem, with Negativity Bias as the most egregious example at 45.3% saturation with 1,238 hits. Analysis detected 5,776 faulty-reasoning hits from 2,733 analyzed words across 1 article, generating a BS Score of 7.8% and a BS Rank of ⁠92% (3,169 of 37,536 keywords). This Justice Department Redactions is worse (more manipulative) than 91.60% of the peer group.
Justice Department Redactions
Keyword ranking list
PercentileKeywordBS Score
⁠0%Lieutenant Governor1%
⁠0%Agriculture Commissioner1%
⁠0%Texas Supreme Court1%
⁠0%Tropic Care Of Florida1%
⁠0%Running Back1%
⁠92%Justice Department Redactions (selected)8%
⁠100%Rad Power Bikes60%
⁠100%Mike Lewis60%
⁠100%Joni Balter60%
⁠100%Lawrence O'donnell69%
⁠100%Bondi Beach Shooting70%
Keyword details
Total words: 2,733
Article count: 1
Authors

Ranking context

Position among analyzed keywords

92% percentile
025507510091.6% percentile
7.8% BS Score1 analyzed articles2.7K analyzed words

Reasoning profile

Selected profile versus the sitewide rate

KeywordSitewideShared scale 0–50%
0.0%10%20%30%40%50%Negativity BiasSitewide 19.2%Keyword 45.3%45.3%Confirmation BiasSitewide 7.5%Keyword 23.0%23.0%Ad HominemSitewide 2.2%Keyword 17.4%17.4%Framing EffectSitewide 26.9%Keyword 12.8%12.8%Fundamental Attribution E…Sitewide 2.7%Keyword 10.6%10.6%Appeal to EmotionSitewide 15.9%Keyword 23.1%23.1%Horn EffectSitewide 1.0%Keyword 7.5%7.5%Begging the QuestionSitewide 1.7%Keyword 7.5%7.5%In-Group BiasSitewide 6.9%Keyword 12.0%12.0%Out-Group Homogeneity BiasSitewide 3.1%Keyword 7.6%7.6%

Sitewide departure map

Above the diagonal means this profile uses the pattern more often

0.0%0.0%10%10%20%20%30%30%40%40%50%50%Negativity Bias: Keyword 45.3%, sitewide 19.2%Framing Effect: Keyword 12.8%, sitewide 26.9%Appeal to Emotion: Keyword 23.1%, sitewide 15.9%Confirmation Bias: Keyword 23.0%, sitewide 7.5%Ad Hominem: Keyword 17.4%, sitewide 2.2%In-Group Bias: Keyword 12.0%, sitewide 6.9%Appeal to Authority: Keyword 9.7%, sitewide 11.1%Fundamental Attribution Error: Keyword 10.6%, sitewide 2.7%Hasty Generalization: Keyword 4.8%, sitewide 8.1%Out-Group Homogeneity Bias: Keyword 7.6%, sitewide 3.1%Begging the Question: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 1.7%Horn Effect: Keyword 7.5%, sitewide 1.0%Halo Effect: Keyword 3.0%, sitewide 6.7%Overconfidence Bias: Keyword 4.2%, sitewide 4.6%Anchoring Bias: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 4.0%Self-Serving Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 3.7%Status Quo Bias: Keyword 3.4%, sitewide 2.2%Straw Man: Keyword 3.3%, sitewide 0.9%Genetic Fallacy: Keyword 3.1%, sitewide 1.4%Tu Quoque: Keyword 2.3%, sitewide 0.2%False Dilemma: Keyword 2.2%, sitewide 1.5%Burden of Proof: Keyword 2.0%, sitewide 0.4%Slippery Slope: Keyword 1.3%, sitewide 1.7%Actor-Observer Bias: Keyword 1.0%, sitewide 0.6%Negativity BiasSitewide rateKeyword rate

Analyzed articles and videos